Journal article
M. DiStefano, S. Karim, C. Krubiner, K. Hofman
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
DiStefano, M., Karim, S., Krubiner, C., & Hofman, K. (2022). Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health in South Africa: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Substantive Values in Landmark Judicial Decisions. Journal of Law, Medicine &Amp; Ethics.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
DiStefano, M., S. Karim, C. Krubiner, and K. Hofman. “Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health in South Africa: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Substantive Values in Landmark Judicial Decisions.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (2022).
MLA
Click to copy
DiStefano, M., et al. “Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health in South Africa: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Substantive Values in Landmark Judicial Decisions.” Journal of Law, Medicine &Amp; Ethics, 2022.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{m2022a,
title = {Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health in South Africa: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Substantive Values in Landmark Judicial Decisions},
year = {2022},
journal = {Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics},
author = {DiStefano, M. and Karim, S. and Krubiner, C. and Hofman, K.}
}
Abstract
Abstract The World Health Assembly has encouraged WHO member-states to establish capacity in health technology assessment (HTA) as a support for achieving universal health coverage (UHC). Simultaneously, the WHO has stated that UHC is “a practical expression of the concern for health equity and the right to health.” This has prompted questions about potential tensions between priority-setting efforts and the right to health on the road to UHC. South Africa (SA) is an ideal setting in which to explore how the priority-setting work of an HTA body may be integrated with an existing rights framework.
