Journal article
M. DiStefano, S. Abdool Karim, C. Krubiner
Health Policy and Planning, 2021
Health Policy and Planning, 2021
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMedCentral
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
DiStefano, M., Karim, S. A., & Krubiner, C. (2021). Integrating health technology assessment and the right to health: a qualitative content analysis of procedural values in South African judicial decisions. Health Policy and Planning.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
DiStefano, M., S. Abdool Karim, and C. Krubiner. “Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health: a Qualitative Content Analysis of Procedural Values in South African Judicial Decisions.” Health Policy and Planning (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
DiStefano, M., et al. “Integrating Health Technology Assessment and the Right to Health: a Qualitative Content Analysis of Procedural Values in South African Judicial Decisions.” Health Policy and Planning, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{m2021a,
title = {Integrating health technology assessment and the right to health: a qualitative content analysis of procedural values in South African judicial decisions},
year = {2021},
journal = {Health Policy and Planning},
author = {DiStefano, M. and Karim, S. Abdool and Krubiner, C.}
}
Abstract
Abstract South Africa’s move towards implementing National Health Insurance includes a commitment to establish a health technology assessment (HTA) body to inform health priority-setting decisions. This study sought to analyse health rights cases in South Africa to inform the identification of country-specific procedural values related to health priority-setting and their implementation in a South African HTA body. The focus on health rights cases is motivated in part by the fact that case law can be an important source of insight into the values of a particular country. This focus is further motivated by a desire to mitigate the potential tension between a rights-based approach to healthcare access and national efforts to set health priorities. A qualitative content analysis of eight South African court cases related to the right to health was conducted. Cases were identified through a LexisNexis search and supplemented with expert judgement. Procedural values identified from the health priority-setting literature, including those comprising Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R), structured the thematic analysis. The importance of transparency and revision—two elements of A4R—is evident in our findings, suggesting that the courts can help to enforce elements of A4R. Yet our findings also indicate that A4R is likely to be insufficient for ensuring that HTA in South Africa meets the procedural demands of a constitutional rights-based approach to healthcare access. Accordingly, we also suggest that a South African HTA body ought to consider more demanding considerations related to transparency and revisions as well as explicit considerations related to inclusivity.
