Journal article
Global Health Action, 2021
APA
Click to copy
Mukanu, M., Karim, S. A., Hofman, K., Erzse, A., & Thow, A. (2021). Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia. Global Health Action.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Mukanu, M., S. Abdool Karim, K. Hofman, A. Erzse, and A. Thow. “Nutrition Related Non-Communicable Diseases and Sugar Sweetened Beverage Policies: a Landscape Analysis in Zambia.” Global Health Action (2021).
MLA
Click to copy
Mukanu, M., et al. “Nutrition Related Non-Communicable Diseases and Sugar Sweetened Beverage Policies: a Landscape Analysis in Zambia.” Global Health Action, 2021.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{m2021a,
title = {Nutrition related non-communicable diseases and sugar sweetened beverage policies: a landscape analysis in Zambia},
year = {2021},
journal = {Global Health Action},
author = {Mukanu, M. and Karim, S. Abdool and Hofman, K. and Erzse, A. and Thow, A.}
}
ABSTRACT Background: Taxation on unhealthy products is recommended as a cost-effective intervention to address the global burden of non-communicable diseases. Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages dis-incentivize consumption of unhealthy products. Implementation of such policies is difficult in Sub-Saharan African countries, which are targets for global corporate expansion by the sugar-sweetened beverages industry. Objective: To identify opportunities to strengthen policies relating to sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Zambia, through: (1) understanding the policy landscape and political context in which policies for nutrition-related non-communicable diseases are being developed, particularly sugar-sweetened beverage taxation, and exploring the potential use of revenue arising from sugar-sweetened beverage taxation to support improved nutrition. Methods: We conducted a retrospective qualitative policy analysis with a review of nutrition-related non-communicable diseases policies and key informant interviews (n = 10) with policy actors. Data were coded and analyzed data using pre-constructed matrices based on the Kingdon’s Policy Agenda Framework. Results: Government responses to nutrition-related non-communicable diseases were developed in an incoherent policy environment. The health sector’s commitment to regulate sugar-sweetened beverages conflicted with the manufacturing sector’s priorities for economic growth. Increased regulation of sugar-sweetened beverages was a priority for the health sector. Economic interests sought to grow the manufacturing sector, including the food and beverage industries. Consequently, incoherent policy objectives might have contributed to the adoption of a weakened excise tax. The general public were poorly informed about nutrition-related non-communicable diseases. Conclusions: The tension between the Government’s economic and public health priorities is a barrier for strengthening fiscal measures to address nutrition-related non-communicable diseases. However, this did not prevent the introduction of a differential sugar tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Opportunities exist to strengthen the existing taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages in Zambia. These include a more inclusive consultation process for policy formulation and comprehensive monitoring of risk factors.